Posts Tagged ‘Tumblr’

 

Boulder Digital Works’ Occupationalist.org Aggregates Like No Other

Monday, November 7th, 2011

The Occupy Wall Street protests have been anything but typical.  There is no clear leader of the movement, their message is very broad, and it is taking place throughout every major city (and not so major cities) in the country.

The strange thing is, though, it doesn’t show any signs of slowing down.  As of today, the Occupy Wall Street movement has been going strong for over 50 days.

Ten years ago, this may not have been possible.  Through the use of social media sites like Facebook, Twitter, and Tumblr, protestors in cities all over the country have been able to communicate and organize activities for thousands of people.

But, even with all of the tools that social media offers, it can still be difficult to know what is happening minute to minute.  What modern day protests thrive on is speed of communication.  While one group may be using Twitter to communicate, another group could be using Tumblr or Facebook.  It takes time and vigilance to keep an eye on every social media outlet.  There was a need to bring all of this information together on one page.

It’s often said that necessity is the mother of invention, and out of a need for better aggregation came Occupationalist.org.  Constructed by Boulder Digital Works, the site curates every bit of social media data for the movement from various Twitter hashtags to a map that shows the number of Foursquare check-ins for each city.  It truly is a social media lovers dream.

Here’s how the creators of Occupationalist.org describe themselves:

“Occupationalist is an impartial and real-time view of the Occupy Wall Street movement. Covering history as it unfolds. No filters. No delays.”

Given the success of Occupationalist.org, we’re likely to see other aggregation sites like it popping up for other movements.  Keeping participants up to date on the latest information is crucial.  Those that do it best are the most successful.

Social Media is Becoming More Visual

Monday, September 26th, 2011

This past week, Facebook unveiled its new Timeline, which will replace the traditional profile page that we’re all used to.  If you’re wondering why you haven’t seen the change on your own profile, it’s because Facebook is rolling out the new feature slowly.  So far, only Facebook Developers are able to make the change.  However, thanks to a tip from our friends at Mashable, anyone is capable of taking the new layout for a test drive.

If you frequently share images, one of the first things you’ll notice about the latest feature is that they are much more pronounced.  The current version of the profile that is being replaced was much more text oriented.  Images were merely icons, which meant an extra click of the mouse if you wanted to see it in more detail.

Mark Zuckerberg‘s intention with the layout change was to create an emotional experience as you look back on someone’s life through Facebook.  Knowing that, it’s no surprise that larger images were used to create that effect.  A single picture can illicit that emotional experience in a way that would take a thousand words to describe.  It’s now much easier to see a child grow over the years, watch someone make an amazing physical transformation, or remember all the amazing destinations you’ve travelled to.

When Facebook makes a change to what will grab a user’s attention the most, the ripple effect can be profound.  For instance, it won’t be surprising to see apps like Instagram and Hipstamatic grow even more popular than they already are.

Additionally, we already know that the most successful Tumblr posts are typically images with a small amount of text, so that leaves us wondering if Twitter will make a change to put more of an emphasis on images, as well.  If the rest of the social web begins to move toward a largely image focused way of sharing, it would be interesting to see if they incorporate them into their platform.

So tell us, do you think we are moving toward a more image based social web?  Why or why not?